Defense Doesn’t Pay in the NBA

Earlier this month ESPN unveiled a new advanced basketball metric called “real plus-minus” (RPM). The statistic was developed by Jeremias Engelmann and is trumpeted as an improvement over its predecessors, adjusted plus-minus and real adjusted plus-minus. One of the unique features of RPM is that it splits a player’s impact into offensive RPM (ORPM) and defensive RPM (DRPM). While ESPN has yet to unveil the exact methodology for RPM, early reactions to the stat can be read here, here and here. According to ESPN:

“RPM estimates how many points each player adds or subtracts, on average, to his team’s net scoring margin for each 100 possessions played. The RPM model also yields separate ratings for the player’s impact on both ends of the court: offensive RPM (ORPM) and defensive RPM (DRPM).”

Naturally, we were interested in visualizing the relationship between RPM and NBA salaries. With the exception of a few notable outliers (Stoudemire and Boozer), we found a strong relationship between RPM and annual salary. Once you take into account players who signed large contracts before suffering serious injuries (Stoudemire) and players on the end of lengthy contracts whose skills may have deteriorated (Pau Gasol), on average NBA teams appear to reward higher RPMs with higher salaries. However, as you’ll see in this first graphic there are a lot of players who fall well-below or well-above the line of best fit.


To understand what’s happening here we have to unpack RPM into its offensive and defensive components. The bottom line may not come as a surprise. From a salary perspective, offense trumps defense, by a lot. Merging ESPN’s RPM data with salary information from Basketball-Reference, we estimate that an additional point in ORPM is worth on average $1.4M extra a year in salary while an additional point in DRPM only earns an $700K on average. This makes defense a bargain when you consider that a point scored should be equivalent to a point prevented.

The results are even more striking when we control for position. In essence, we’re now asking for the average relationship between salary and RPM within position. Using the same specification but now with controls for position, we find that a point in ORPM is still valuable at $1.5M (and highly statistically significant) while a point in DRPM falls to $300K (and is no longer statistically significant). To reiterate this, if we compare two players at the same position we find that difference in their salaries is heavily driven by their production on the offensive end and has no connection to their defensive impact. For those who have argued that defense is under-rewarded in the NBA, this may not be a smoking gun, but it is notable.


We can also rank players in the NBA according to value by constructing their predicted salary based on ORPM, DRPM, position and tenure and comparing this to their actual salaries. To be conservative, we dropped anyone who played fewer than 50 games this season. Below is a list of the top and bottom five players by value in three categories: guards, forwards and centers.

Top 5 Players by Position

Guards Fowards Centers
Name Value Name Value Name Value
Vince Carter $6,422,378 Nick Collison $11,015,718 Audray Blatche $8,663,985
Ray Allen $5,464,209 Chris Andersen $9,654,286 Ryan Hollins $6,032,525
Goran Dragic $5,185,118 Mike Miller $8,263,340 Nazr Mohammed $5,131,789
Derek Fisher $4,658,847 Matt Barnes $7,520,160 Alexis Ajinca $4,917,366
Kyle Lowry $4,465,802 Matt Bonner $7,254,578 BeJuan Blair $4,725,142

Bottom 5 Players by Position

Guards Fowards Centers
Name Value Name Value Name Value
Joe Johnson -$13,011,606 Amare Stoudemire -$18,847,008 Dwight Howard -$10,757,813
Dwyane Wade -$12,158,871 Carlos Boozer -$12,417,897 Pau Gasol -$9,139,959
Deron Williams -$8,344,061 Rudy Gay -$11,260,331 Chris Bosh -$9,090,025
Eric Gordon -$7,023,669 Carmelo Anthony -$10,155,075 DeMarcus Cousins -$7,399,312
John Wall -$6,838,249 Blake Griffin -$8,622,789 Roy Hibbert -$5,980,450

We’ll post links to the full lists by position shortly.


2 thoughts on “Defense Doesn’t Pay in the NBA

  1. Cool analysis guys, I’ll definitely be following this blog in the future. I think one reason why defense is so under-rewarded is that there aren’t very many metrics out there that accurately evaluate a player’s defensive contribution. There are way more easily quantifiable variables on the offensive side, particularly because defense requires much more teamwork than offense does, at least in basketball. To recast your quip, you don’t need everyone’s help to score a point on offense, but you generally need everyone’s help to stop a point from being scored on defense.

    On the point about a lack of defensive metrics, it might be interesting to consider perceptions of defensive ability and whether they are correlated with salary. As an example, a couple seasons ago Steve Novak was generally considered the worst defender on the Knicks. I read a post (, however, that claimed he actually had a good defensive rating. The reason was that he guarded a lot of the other team’s weakest players and his reputation lulled them into a false sense of security so they would take harder, lower percentage shots. So when a GM gives Novak a contract, the GM will be basing it solely on his offense since he thinks his defense is poor, but when you use this statistic it would show some influence from his defense as being a reason why he got the money he did.

    You get at this in the post, but you would ideally want to look at the players’ statistics in his contract year as the exogenous variable, since again this is what the GM is basing his decision on, though I wouldn’t be surprised if you couldn’t do that because of data availability since this is a new statistic. If you want to determine what qualities GMs “reward” you really want to examine the data that they are looking at. Although you can argue there is a difference between what they were trying to reward intentionally, versus what they actually ended up rewarding.

    Great post and I look forward to the next one!

  2. Very interesting! I love nerding out to sports stats. Not surprised to see defense being undervalued, given the challenges of developing effective defensive statistics, and maybe also a bias toward offense in sports in general. Quick thought about the value chart at the end – with just a cursory glance, it looks like the added-value players are mostly not starters, while the over-valued players are. I would be interested to see how that plays out across the larger stat group, and whether starters are generally over-valued and bench players/6th men (like Fisher and Collison) are value-adds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s